Twitter Tips & Strategies

How to Write a Community Note on Twitter

By Spencer Lanoue
October 31, 2025

Ever seen a tweet that looked a little off, followed by a helpful clarification appearing right underneath it? That’s a Community Note in action, and it’s one of the most interesting tools X (formerly Twitter) has introduced to combat misinformation. This guide will walk you through exactly how Community Notes work, how you can become a contributor, and most importantly, how to write notes that are genuinely helpful and actually get approved.

What Are Community Notes (And Why Should You Care)?

Community Notes is a collaborative, crowdsourced system on X designed to add context to potentially misleading tweets. Think of it as a transparent, user-driven system for fact-checking and clarification. When a note is rated "helpful" by a broad enough group of contributors, it becomes publicly visible beneath the tweet for everyone to see.

Unlike traditional moderation, this isn't about deciding to delete a post. It's about empowering the community to provide more information. The goal isn’t to censor content but to enrich the conversation with facts so people can make their own informed judgments.

So, why should a brand manager, marketer, or content creator care? Two big reasons:

  • Brand Safety & Reputation: Understanding how misinformation is being contextualized helps you navigate the platform safely. You can better protect your brand from being associated with false narratives and keep an eye on industry conversations to ensure they’re factually based. If one of your own tweets is ever misunderstood or taken out of context, Community Notes could be the very system that clarifies your intent.
  • Credibility & Authority: Becoming a valuable contributor to Community Notes is a powerful way to establish your credibility - not as a brand, but as an individual. By providing factual, well-sourced context, you’re actively contributing to a healthier online environment. It's a subtle but meaningful way to participate in the platform's ecosystem beyond just posting content.

Your Path to Becoming a Community Notes Contributor

The good news is that becoming a contributor isn’t an exclusive, invite-only club. Anyone who meets a few basic criteria can sign up to participate. The process is designed to bring in a wide range of perspectives.

The Eligibility Checklist

To join, you need to meet these simple requirements:

  • Your account has had no X rule violations since January 1, 2023.
  • Your account is at least 6 months old.
  • You have a verified phone number associated with your account.
  • Note: Your account does not need to be verified with a blue checkmark.

Step-by-Step: Signing Up

If you meet the criteria, joining is straightforward. Head over to the Community Notes section in your X profile's side menu or navigate directly to the sign-up page. You'll be asked to agree to the program's core values, which include contributing to build understanding, acting in good faith, and helping, not harming.

Moving From Rater to Writer

Here’s a crucial detail many new users miss: you don't start out writing notes. Your journey as a contributor begins by rating existing notes written by others.

As a new contributor, you will be shown a special timeline of notes that need rating. For each one, you’ll judge whether it’s "Helpful," "Somewhat Helpful," or "Not Helpful" based on the platform's guidelines. This is your training ground. Your goal is to build a "Rating Impact" score.

You earn a positive Rating Impact when your ratings align with the final consensus. For instance, if you consistently rate a note as "Helpful" and it ends up being published, your score increases. If you rate a note "Not Helpful" and it ultimately gets an overwhelming "Not Helpful" score from others, your score also increases. Once you reach a Rating Impact score of 5, you unlock the ability to write a new note.

This "rate-first" approach ensures that contributors understand what a high-quality note looks like before they start creating their own.

How to Write a Community Note That Actually Gets Approved

You’ve unlocked the ability to write notes. Now comes the important part. Writing a note that gets approved as "Helpful" isn't about having the cleverest takedown or the strongest opinion. It's about following a few core principles that prioritize facts and neutrality.

Principle 1: Cite High-Quality Sources (This is Non-Negotiable)

This is the golden rule of Community Notes. A note without a strong, reputable source is dead on arrival. Your entire purpose is to provide objective context, and that context is only as good as the evidence you provide.

  • What counts as a high-quality source?
    • Major, editorially-independent news outlets (Associated Press, Reuters, BBC, etc.)
    • Academic papers or research from respected institutions.
    • Official government publications or public records.
    • Direct links to primary sources, like the full video of an event, court documents, or a public transcript.
  • What doesn’t count?
    • Opinion articles or blog posts.
    • Other social media posts or user-generated content.
    • Hyper-partisan news sites known for biased reporting.
    • Your own personal website or a source you have a vested interest in.

Example in action:

Imagine a tweet showing an out-of-context video clip of a CEO, making it seem like she said something outrageous.

  • Bad Note (No Source): "This is totally false. The context is missing from the clip."
  • Good Note (With Source): "This clip is from a longer speech given at the annual shareholder meeting. The full context shows she was quoting a hypothetical scenario. [Link to the official A/V recording on the company’s investor relations site]"

Principle 2: Be Neutral and Factual, Not Opinionated

Your job is to be the encyclopedia, not the columnist. A Community Note is a space for facts, not feelings. You are adding context to help others understand the situation, not trying to win an argument or assert your viewpoint. Your language should be as neutral and dispassionate as possible.

Avoid any language that sounds biased, sarcastic, emotional, or disrespectful towards the person who sent the tweet.

Example in action:

Let's say a tweet shows an old photo of a flooded city, claiming it was taken yesterday.

  • Bad Note (Opinionated): "This lying grifter is trying to fool everyone with an old photo. Don't fall for this obvious manipulation!"
  • Good Note (Neutral & Factual): "This photograph was taken in 2017 during Hurricane Harvey. Multiple news outlets published it at that time. [Link to a reputable news article from 2017 showing the photo]"

Principle 3: Address the Tweet Directly

Your note needs to connect directly to a claim made in the tweet itself. It's not a place for "whataboutism" or tangentially related facts. If a tweet claims "new data shows X," your note should provide context on that specific data - what the source is, if it's being misinterpreted, or if conflicting data exists.

Keep your note focused. The more directly and concisely you can address the potentially misleading element of the tweet, the more helpful it will be.

Principle 4: Be Easy to Understand

Clarity is key. Write in simple, straightforward language that an average person with no prior expertise can quickly understand. Avoid jargon, acronyms, and overly complex sentence structures. Remember, users are scrolling quickly, your note needs to be digestible in just a few seconds.

Structure your note simply: Introduce the context, state the fact, and link the source. That’s it.

From "Submitted" to "Helpful": How Notes Get Rated

Once you submit a note, it isn’t automatically published. It enters the rating process, where it's shown to other contributors. For a note to earn the "Helpful" status and become public, it must be rated as helpful by a sufficient number of contributors who have historically disagreed in their past ratings of other notes. This clever mechanism prevents echo chambers or partisan brigades from pushing a one-sided note through. It forces a consensus across differing viewpoints.

Consistently writing notes that are rated "Helpful" increases your "Writing Impact" score, reinforcing your status as a trusted contributor. Conversely, if your notes are often rated "Not Helpful," your score will decrease, and you may temporarily lose the ability to write new notes.

Common Pitfalls: Why Most Community Notes Get Rejected

Most rejected notes fail for a few consistent reasons. Keep these common mistakes in mind as a final checklist of things to avoid.

Mistake 1: Relying on a Single, Biased Source

Contributors will rightly question a note that sources a highly partisan outlet to debunk a claim from the opposite political perspective. Strive for the most objective sources possible to build trust.

Mistake 2: Making It Personal

Again, a note should address the tweet's content, not its author. Attacking the person, questioning their motives, or using insulting language is a fast track to a "Not Helpful" rating.

Mistake 3: Sharing "Facts" that are Opinions in Disguise

Statements like "This policy would be damaging to the economy" or "This is an unethical action" are opinions, even if you feel they are true. Stick to verifiable information.

Mistake 4: Not Citing a Source at All

It's worth saying one more time: a note without external evidence is just another tweet. It will invariably be rejected.

Final Thoughts

Writing a successful Community Note is less about winning a debate and more about becoming a helpful, neutral source of facts. By focusing on high-quality sources, maintaining a fact-first tone, and directly addressing the claim in a tweet, you can add genuine value to the platform and contribute to a more informed public conversation.

Staying on top of your brand’s own narrative and engaging effectively in a world where context is so vital can feel like a full-time job. At Postbase, we built our platform precisely to simplify those complexities. By gathering your content planning, scheduling, community engagement, and essential analytics into one clear, visual dashboard, we help you manage your presence without the chaos, freeing you up to focus on what matters most: creating great content that connects.

Spencer's spent a decade building products at companies like Buffer, UserTesting, and Bump Health. He's spent years in the weeds of social media management—scheduling posts, analyzing performance, coordinating teams. At Postbase, he's building tools to automate the busywork so you can focus on creating great content.

Other posts you might like

How to Add Social Media Icons to an Email Signature

Enhance your email signature by adding social media icons. Discover step-by-step instructions to turn every email into a powerful marketing tool.

Read more

How to Add an Etsy Link to Pinterest

Learn how to add your Etsy link to Pinterest and drive traffic to your shop. Discover strategies to create converting pins and turn browsers into customers.

Read more

How to Grant Access to Facebook Business Manager

Grant access to your Facebook Business Manager securely. Follow our step-by-step guide to add users and assign permissions without sharing your password.

Read more

How to Record Audio for Instagram Reels

Record clear audio for Instagram Reels with this guide. Learn actionable steps to create professional-sounding audio, using just your phone or upgraded gear.

Read more

How to Add Translation in an Instagram Post

Add translations to Instagram posts and connect globally. Learn manual techniques and discover Instagram's automatic translation features in this guide.

Read more

How to Optimize Facebook for Business

Optimize your Facebook Business Page for growth and sales with strategic tweaks. Learn to engage your community, create captivating content, and refine strategies.

Read more

Stop wrestling with outdated social media tools

Wrestling with social media? It doesn’t have to be this hard. Plan your content, schedule posts, respond to comments, and analyze performance — all in one simple, easy-to-use tool.

Schedule your first post
The simplest way to manage your social media
Rating